Closed 7Ji closed 1 month ago
completely agree, mesa-panfrost-git and mesa-panvk-git are experimental packages and there is no need build them. If someone really needs it, he can build from the pkgbuild.
However your scores are very low, i think you tested when your gpu governor 'ondemand', when set the performance, mesa-panfrost-git gives a slight boost, but nobody needs this as the moment.
here are some results with mesa-panfrost-git with performance governor
One important remark is, only "terrain" and "refract" results matter for evaluation gpu performance, there rest of the tests are snythetic random numbers, so to shorten the test you can just use "-b terrain" when running glmark.
Thanks for the info. I'll use performance
in the future. Closing then.
However your scores are very low, i think you tested when your gpu governor 'ondemand', when set the performance, mesa-panfrost-git gives a slight boost, but nobody needs this as the moment.
Maybe you've overlooked the test arguments? I was testing with 3840x2160 offscreen, not the default 800x600. The score is inversely proportional to the size. I've tested again with default 800x600 and 'performance' boosted score from 3049 to 3182, not very much. But anyway, the score tells the active cooling + big heat sink helps a lot in performance.
Ah true, of course the rendering size is a big factor
So I did a simple test with
glmark2-es-wayland
on bothmesa
(mainline) andmesa-panfrost-git
(the merge source), the mainline, able to run on G610 now, performs pretty much the same asmesa-panfrost-git
, as expected.Both running
glmark2-es-wayland --size 3840x2160 --off-screen
on-rockchip-bsp6.1-joshua-git
withpanthor
:With
mesa-mainline-24.1.5-arch1.1
:With
mesa-panfrost-git-24.1.0-devel-git-4ab1904496
:I've deleted the empty PKGBUILD for
mesa-panfrost-git
here and it would be removed from the repo build list.@hbiyik FYI.