Open 7mwang opened 1 month ago
Assignment | Weightage | Grade | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
College Board Coverage | 20 | 19 | Had complete coverage over all College Board curriculum, including other key details like jagged arrays. Also has questions commonly tested by College Board to teach students what to expect on the AP test and how to prepare for it. |
Java Examples | 30 | 28 | Java examples are very strong, organized, and well thought out. All the examples have comments explaining what the code means. None of the java code blocks are extremely long which helps keeps students engaged. Lots of the examples also have a visual to help students visualize concepts which is memorable and effective. For example, the visuals for binary search (what it is and its applications) made understanding your java examples much easier. |
Popcorn Hack Usage | 10 | 9 | Popcorn hacks are relevant to the lesson taught. There are lots of popcorn hacks spread across all the lessons to keep students engaged and make sure they are learning the material. Some are of the hacks are more challenging to get the students thinking and to apply their knowledge, and some other taken from College Board which allows students to prepare for the AP test better. |
Homework | 10 | 9 | The homework hacks incorporate knowledge from every section in the lesson to ensure students can get practice and feedback on everything in the lesson. Some of the homework hacks are also taken from College Board which is good. |
Grading Plan | 10 | 9 | Grading seems fair and solid. Am a little confused on what "Grade (1-4)" represents or how they are being given to students. Comments on each student seems solid, but maybe could provide some personalized feedback if they did anything wrong in their code. |
Original an Creative | 10 | 9 | The lesson seems creative and unique. The examples with visuals accompanying them is memorable. Text in lesson is pretty short with more of an emphasis on the examples, visuals, and hacks which keeps students interactive and engaged, helping them learn the lesson better. |
Total | 90 | 83 | Overall, the lesson plan is well-designed and effective, covering the necessary curriculum thoroughly and keeping students engaged through relevant examples and interactive activities. The use of visuals and concise explanations helps make complex concepts more understandable. While the grading plan is solid, more personalized feedback could improve it. The lesson also shows creativity, with a focus on practical applications and interactive elements to enhance student learning. |
Assignment | Weightage | Grade | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
College Board Coverage | 20 | 19 | covered all college board material |
Java Examples | 30 | 27 | provided good java examples that demonstrated knowledge |
Popcorn Hack Usage | 10 | 9 | good placement of hacks that confirmed students' understanding |
Homework | 10 | 9 | Good homeworks overall. |
Grading Plan | 10 | 9 | Organized and straightforward grading. |
Original an Creative | 10 | 8 | Lack of creativity |
Total | 90 | 81 |
Hi Matthew, I liked how you mentioned how you revised your lesson based on the feedback you reviewed.
Blog - Showcases his blog which has everything should be prepared for collegeboard
Memory - Worked on it after(jagged arrays) naming conventions etc fixed to show chnages
Relevancy - Talks about learning from seperate lesson
Beyond Perfunctory - Improved and then submitted pull request even thought it was late also supported his team teach a lot lots of commits to back it up.
Hi Matthew,
I'm glad you were able to improve your lesson with all of the pull requests. Your lesson was very relevant because it had collegeboard frq homework and this is nice to prepare us for the AP exam.
Blog - Made commits for the teamteach and di lots of pullrequests to perfect it. Memory - It was working on it afterwards with Mr. Mortensens feedback, and he worked on fixing naming conventions. Relevancy - Nikhils lesson so students could self study and had a lot of depth on the concepts. Beyond Perfunctory - Went above and beyond for improving the teamteach with a PR
Hi Matthew, I liked how you wanted to still improve your team teach based on Mort's feedback despite already taught it to the class.
I like the summaries for each lesson that you included, it makes referring back to the teamteaches easier. I like the inclusion of collaboration and the changes you made even after your lesson, showing dedication to improvement and iteration.
I liked your team teach and I think its really clear how much effort you put in.
Blog - in association with Units and Teaching Memory - something to recall your individual presentation Relevancy - something impactful you learned Beyond Perfunctory - something that shows you want to learn
Summaries for lessons and topics. Self study Unit 9 and the depth. Made 4 to 5 pull requests including feedback update. Discussed collaboration. Memory was on update after arrays. Provide College HW example. Average comments, but good code examples.
I really like your in-depth descriptions, making sure that each section has concrete evidence. I also found it really interesting that you guys had continued to work on your team teach even beyond the lesson.
Hi your blog was really good as it included summaries from each lesson and had in depth descriptions
Discussed how improved team teach even after was completed. Talked about team teaches he though was relevant.
I liked your presentation and your homework and how its from college board. I also liked how you said how your team communicated by slack.
I like how you used a great amount of detail which is helpful as it shows you know what you are talking about and I like how you pointed out the memorable lessons.
I like how you showed summaries and discussed improvement after reviewing on your team teach.
Relevancy Checklist
Reviews exchanged with Arthur Liu and David Lee, Scores averaged, comments combined