Language TypeScript

[mprinc]

What about typescript?

Or how difficult is to describe it by ourselves?

[7ute]

I don't know much of typescript, but I don't think that it would be hard to make some basic symbols. If you want, you can check lib/symbols-list-regex.coffee, tweak some JS regexes and share it as a pull request :)

[mbuc82]

Hello @mprinc ,

do you maybe have some examples / explanations of how such symbols should look like? Maybe i can help adding them to the regexes.

Regards Marco

[danyright]

Hi @7ute and everyone else, I quickly checked your package and from what I understand you can easily add a new language by adding the definitions like the other languages in lib/symbols-list-regex.coffee, correct? I've created a definition for TypeScript based on JS which works pretty well, except for methods. Somehow I can't figure the regex out, but I can't find the error. Here's the regex: method: /^[^\S\n]*(?:final|static|abstract|private|protected|public|[^\S\n])*[\s]([\w]+\((\w:[ ]\w[,])*\)\s?:\s?\w)[\s\n]*{/gmi A typical method in TS would be: public myMethod(arg1: any, arg2: number): void {} Everything works, up to the last : void which, when added, gets the method unrecognized. Thanks for your help! As soon as it works I'll create a pull request. D

[mbuc82]

Hello @danyright ,

i've tried to simplify/shorten your regex a bit, please try this:

method: /^[ ](?:final|static|abstract|private|protected|public)[ ]([^)]+:[ ]*[^ ]+)[^\n]+{/gmi

It should work in the all situations and will support unicode characters, what was not possible before.

Regards Marco

[danyright]

Hey @mbuc82 , Thanks for your help! However it does still not recognize a typed method properly. As soon as you add any character after the method's ), it disappears from the list.

Cheers, D

[mbuc82]

Hey @danyright ,

could you maybe provide some sample method strings, that needs to work with this regex? In that case, i could specify it better.

Thanks in advance!

Regards Marco

[danyright]

Hi, Here's a complete class example:

`export default class myClass extends myAbstractClass {

private property1: string;

constructor(arg1: string, arg2: number) {

}

public myMethod1(arg1: string): void {
    console.log("myMethod1");
}

public myMethod2(arg1: string): number {
    return 1;
}

public set property1(arg1: string): void {
    this.property1 = arg1;
}

public get property1(): string {
    return this.property1;
}

}`

As mentioned, the class declaration, the constructor, the setter and getter are recognized, but not the method.

Thanks for your help. D

[mbuc82]

Hey @danyright ,

thank you for your feedback and that example. I'll follow up on this as soon as possible.

Have a nice day!

Cheers Marco

[danyright]

Hey there, Actually, I just gave it another try based on your regex, and here's a solution that isn't perfect but works pretty well in my files: /^[^\S\n]*(?:final|static|abstract|private|protected|public)[ ](.*[^)]*):[ ]*[^ ]+[^\n]+{/gmi

D

[danyright]

Correction: method: /^[^\S\n]*(?:final|static|abstract|private|protected|public)*[ ](.*[^)]*):[ ]*[^ ]+[^\n]+{/gmi Had to add a '*' after final|static|...

Please also find hereby a test file (I had to change the file's extension from .ts to .txt in order to upload it. Just change it back for your tests). Hmm actually I realise that non-method lines are also added to the symbol list...

Thanks for your help :-) D example_TS_class.txt

[danyright]

Hmm getting closer, but now symbols-list can't seem to figure out the method's name anymore... Otherwise the detection is correct. method: /^[^\S\n]*(?:final|static|abstract|private|protected|public)*(?!(get|set|for|foreach|while|if))*[ ]([^ (]+\(.*\)):[ ]*[^ ]+[^\n]+{/gmi

[mbuc82]

Hey @danyright ,

thanks a lot for your testfile, it was of great help so far. I just played around a bit, to just detect the methods. If i understand your pattern correctly, all methods (with and without prefixed private, public etc.) should be matched, but you want to avoid getters and setters (since i guess, you have single patterns for them) because of the negative lookahead. Please try this one:

^[ ]*(?:final|static|abstract|private|protected|public)?[ ]*([^ (]+\(.*\)(?::[ ]+[^ ]+)?)[^\n]+

From your file, it matches the constructor and all methods, but without getters and setters (and without commented out methods) correctly. I like to use space-matches like [ ]* because they also captures tabulators and other types of whitespace (not just spaces).

Please let me know, if it works for you.

Cheers Marco

[danyright]

Hi Marco, Thanks for your help. Sorry, I realize that I didn't tell you that my symbols-list-regex.coffee can be found here: https://github.com/danyright/symbols-list/blob/master/lib/symbols-list-regex.coffee

We're getting closer, but with your suggestion, method/function calls are recognized as methods (for instance this.MyMethod3(); ) - see corrected version of my example file. It looks like if this can be resolved it should work alright.

example_TS_class.txt

D

[mbuc82]

Hello @danyright ,

sorry for my delayed response, i was off for 2 weeks. Thanks for your regex-definitions and the updated example file (which indeed should be used as a testfile in the final version).

I've tweaked the regex a bit again and now the method recognition seems to work good on my side, even with function / method calls in the code:

^[ ]*(?:final|static|abstract|private|protected|public)?[ ]*([^ (]+\(.*\)(?::[ ]+[^ ]+)?)[^\r\n;]+[\r\n]+

Please take a look and let me know, how it works for you.

link to regex101:

https://regex101.com/r/s8FaOT/1

Best regards Marco

[danyright]

Hey Marco, Thank you for this latest code! As far as I can see this seems to work pretty well :-) I will test it thoroughly and let you know.

Thanks for your help, D

[danyright]

Hey Marco, Sorry for the delay. It was working well except for a few issues. I was away for 10 days and wanted to check these at my return, but apparently, the latest symbols-list update (or atom update, I'm not sure) broke something? Because I now only have : Classes, Constructor, Getters & Setters. The rest of the methods is not recognized anymore. Any idea why?

Regards D

[LucaColombi]

hello, any news about this?