Entire project is devastatingly stupid

[twome]

Nothing more to be said.

[Mikotochan]

I read this as "I didn't like my results".

[twome]

I didn't even take the test. No, the core assumptions of the project are entirely arbitrary. Most of the quiz's design is utterly nonsensical.

• "Wealth"? For whom? Through what process? Is this measured by social inequality, material usefulness, monetary wealth? Who doesn't want "wealth"? How is this wealth produced?
• "Peace"? Peace under what conditions? What qualifies as war or violence - is structural/state violence and repression "peaceful"?
• "Progress"? Progress in what direction? Along which dimensions? How is progress evaluated?
• If you claim to measure 8 distinct qualities, then why are you only measuring 4 inputs? On what basis do you counterpose the qualities? On what basis do you decide the weightings for each input that correspond to each ideology? Why do you not even attempt to define these incredibly broad and context-dependent terms like "Progress"? Why is "Authoritarianism" modelled as an ideology, rather than a property of ideologies?

All this quiz determines is what answers people give to this specific quiz. You're either incredibly ignorant about basic sociological/political concepts such as the Overton window, subjectivity/objectivity, test design, and linguistic framing / "leading questions", or you're deliberately being dishonest by disguising your subjective worldview as somehow objective & "testable". You're either a dilettante or a liar, basically – and in whichever case, your blatantly conservative ideology seeps from every pore of this project. This project reads like the work of a STEM-focused high-school student who considers themselves an intellectual titan; "logical", "rational", and "objective". It's amateurish, embarrassing and moronic.