Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Very nice, thank you.
Please can we get a license statement: see
http://h2database.com/html/build.html#providing_patches
for details.
Original comment by noelgrandin
on 31 Oct 2013 at 11:46
I wrote the code, it's mine, and I'm contributing it to H2 for distribution
multiple-licensed under the H2 License, version 1.0, and under the Eclipse
Public License, version 1.0 (http://h2database.com/html/license.html).
Let me know if you need anything else!
Original comment by djgred...@gmail.com
on 31 Oct 2013 at 2:23
Thank you very much, patch committed with minor changes in revision 5278
Original comment by noelgrandin
on 4 Nov 2013 at 7:29
Original comment by noelgrandin
on 4 Nov 2013 at 7:29
[deleted comment]
Can anyone help with applying these patches to h2 database?
Original comment by ponni86....@gmail.com
on 27 Dec 2013 at 7:29
Pinning, this patch has already been committed.
Original comment by noelgrandin
on 27 Dec 2013 at 9:54
So do I need to upgrade my existing H2 1.3.173 (2013-07-28) to higher version
for "Create Sequence SEq_Name
start with
MAXVALUE...:"
to work?? If yes, which version do i updgrade to?
Original comment by ponni86....@gmail.com
on 27 Dec 2013 at 10:03
Upgraded to latest version, but the following doesn't support
"CREATE SEQUENCE ORDER_SEQ
START WITH 500
INCREMENT BY 1
MAXVALUE 1000
CYCLE
CACHE 32"
Original comment by ponni86....@gmail.com
on 27 Dec 2013 at 10:50
Ponni, this change has not been released in an official build yet.
If you want to test it, use the nightly build at
http://h2database.com/html/build.html#automated
Original comment by noelgrandin
on 27 Dec 2013 at 6:54
Has this fix been pushed out yet?
I'm getting the following error:
org.h2.jdbc.JdbcSQLException: Numeric value out of range:
"999999999999999999999999"
I'm trying to apply my existing oracle schema.
Original comment by katel...@gmail.com
on 2 Jul 2014 at 5:56
@katelfox, this fix has been pushed already.
Your existing oracle schema will not work because we do not support values
beyond Long.MAX_VALUE
Original comment by noelgrandin
on 3 Jul 2014 at 2:37
@noelgrandin thank you for the quick response.
Original comment by katel...@gmail.com
on 6 Jul 2014 at 3:39
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
djgred...@gmail.com
on 30 Oct 2013 at 3:20Attachments: