Open 9fc70c892 opened 1 year ago
This is intended behavior.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: Any possibility as accepting this as an issue as a very low
(i.e. cosmetic) after rejecting Inconsistent string validation
(which was recorded as under wrong phase by the script)?
I should have clarified, but I did not have the time to articulate what I wanted to say.
What I have issue is, is not the ability to enter long text, but "the inability to see the long text after inputting it".
After all, an expense name longer than 13 characters might be something a user actually has, and it is not necessarily an extreme behavior.
Examples:
Is putting more details so that I can remember what I bought it for being extreme behavior?
add n/Ikea 092.464.08 for mum's birthday c/PC p/59
add n/Movie ticket Kamen Rider Geats X Revice Movie Battle c/Entertainment p/27
Is putting more details so that I can properly identify the thing I bought as extreme behavior?
You as a computer builder computing student might not put the full name, or might be able to identify just by the identification code. But I as a user who is not familiar with computer parts (do all SoC people build their own PC?), would list the details down. I don't necessarily register it as Asus Motherboard without telling myself what is the model and where I got it from, especially if I am going to review this information months later.
add n/ASUS TUF GAMING 1000W GOLD FULL MODULAR PSU Dynacore 4711081786412 c/PC p/295
add n/ASUS PRIME B550M-A (WI-FI) Motherboard Bizgram c/PC p/289