-
### Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe
Currently OpenSSL blake2 implementation lacks tree hash options; and thus these are not available via openssl bindings in pytho…
-
https://www.blake2.net
-
Hello! I'd like to ask you for adding these 2 hash functions.
Blake2sp-256, Blake2bp-512 as they are. This is a reference implementation as it was presented for NIST hash function competition aka S…
-
The blake2-rfc dependency hasn't been updated in 3 years, has outdated dependencies and open PRs for those. To me this looks like it is no longer maintained. How about switching to https://crates.io/c…
-
Both use `Twox256` instead of e.g. `Twox64Concat`, obfuscating the value of the keys.
from a conversation [here](https://github.com/polkadot-api/papi-console/issues/2#issuecomment-2489038557)
Su…
-
This issue serves as both a request and a discussion point regarding the potential switch of the default hashing algorithm from `BLAKE2B-256-128` to `BLAKE3-256-128`.
https://github.com/kopia/kopia…
mpryc updated
3 months ago
-
Hey I just wanted to ask if it's possible to use the newer lib because it has improvements in speed over the older one. I'm not sure if blake2 is required by the randomx spec but I wanted to ask.
-
I tried to introduce the blake2 module, but the project reported an error and I couldn't find the binding module.
-
https://github.com/RustCrypto/hashes
https://docs.rs/blake2
-
Hi,
could you please benchmark against BLAKE2b and BLAKE2s if it's not too much hassle?
It tries to be a very fast cryptographically secure hash function. I believe it to be still ballpark 10x slower…
kwinz updated
5 years ago