-
I saw you'd published the .brd file for the 256 https://github.com/milkv-duo/duo-files/tree/main/duo-256M/hardware/Reference%20Design_SCH%26PCB
What licence is that available under please? Are you …
samuk updated
2 hours ago
-
@thomasmboa @Fadanka are you happy to change the license to a hardware one like CERN OHL-P?
-
Would love to see a hardware specific license (e.g., Solderpad, CERN Open Hardware, etc.) for the hardware-specific parts! Open hardware is a great movement, and I'm very excited to explore this proje…
-
Interesting project.
I would like to share in my community and was wondering und what Open Source License terms (Probably CERN OHL 2.0?) this collaboration would be.
I could not find an open so…
-
Hi,
I've tried to reach out a few times. I assume you're not interesed in talking. I will point out here that a fully enclosing encslosure would hide copyright information. I'm not sure what you wa…
-
The Readme says the license is "CERN OHL 2.1", but since there isn't a version 2.1 of that license (and version 2.0 was only released last year), did you perhaps mean to write "CERN OHL 1.2"?
-
Hi, I'd like to ship this cool library in the OpenSCAD playground but currently can't as GPL2 can't be shipped as GPL3 (as to why we ship as GPL3, see [its LICENSE](https://github.com/openscad/opensca…
-
Could you switch to a license compliant with the open source hardware guidelines?
[](http://www.oshwa.org/)
I prefer the Cern OHL:
[](http://www.ohwr.org/projects/cernohl/wiki)
-
The following SPDX identifiers are not in this repo/JSON file but are listed on the [OSI website](https://opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical):
- [x] 0BSD
- [x] BSD-2-Clause-Patent
- [x] BSD-1…
-
The CERN OHL states that it "does not apply to software, firmware, or code loaded into programmable devices".
How would feel about specifying a license for the code you've provided? [MIT](https://ope…