-
JUnit5 has been out for a while now and JUnit4 hasn't been updated/supported for years. Most new extensions, etc. only support JUnit5. Don't think we are currently using any intricate junit features, …
-
### Feature Request / Improvement
In our contributing guidelines we point people to writing new unit tests using JUni5.
We should consider/evaluate what the best approach would be to eventually m…
-
Because the compiler generates junit5 tests (see usethesource/rascalcore project) we can not run Rascal interpreter-based tests in the same project where the compiler is also used.
A really comple…
-
JUnit 5 offers significant improvements over JUnit 4, including more powerful and flexible testing capabilities like annotation-based coding(so we don't need to write assume), parallel test execution,…
-
#### Bug Report Checklist
- [ ] Have you provided a full/minimal spec to reproduce the issue?
- [ ] Have you validated the input using an OpenAPI validator ([example](https://apidevtools.org/swagg…
-
The decision on what to do is still open. We have to discuss if we should update to JUnit5 or use Spock.
### JUnit5 Upgrade
Migration guide: https://www.baeldung.com/junit-5-migration
With JUnit V…
-
```
Hi there,
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Use junit4.10.jar
2. When using:
@RunIf(value = OSChecker.class, arguments = OSChecker.WINDOWS)
in a Mac environment, the test still run…
-
[reports.zip](https://github.com/HolzQA/CashBackHacker/files/11161607/reports.zip)
-
Right now all our tests are using old-style JUnit syntax. We should upgrade to JUnit4 and start writing tests with the simplified JUnit4 syntax.
It's not necessary to upgrade all our old tests to the…
-
As this project already works with jUnit5 because the Spring-based boilerplate, jUnit4 is no longer necessary. But it's still in use on test suites. So, we need to remove that on the future.