-
This issue closely mirrors the issue below, so you should read that one first before this one:
https://github.com/rhayes777/PyAutoFit/issues/1026
The following PR adds the `physical_values` of a…
-
I guess the export yet doesn't support exporting "IfcPhysicalComplexQuantity" yet?
-
It would be nice if we could obtain physical quantities as `f64`, or a struct that contains both the value and an uncertainty.
-
@corranwebster What is the status of this package? Do we use it anywhere? It looks like it is unfinished. It refers to a `Quantity` class that does not appear to exist yet. C.f. #51
rkern updated
5 years ago
-
For some simulations I get non-physical quantities, typically, temperatures that are way below the lowest temperature b.c. in the simulation. This is likely due to undestabilization/under-resolution. …
-
On the physical quantities document, I had these thoughts/questions on a quick read through:
- Do we need to define extensive/intensive more directly? (Perhaps with the convenience of GitHub we shoul…
-
Here, derived physical quantities are quantities that are defined in terms of other quantities. For example:
Velocity = Length / Time
Area = Length \* Length
Acceleration = Length / Time / Time
Curr…
-
Dear developers,
Thank you very much for developing such a powerful tool to calculate various physical quantities.
I am currently trying to learn nonlinear optical properties like shift current and …
-
## TLDR:
* Adding variables of the same physical dimension but with different unit prefixes is not allowed.
* The reason is concern about precision loss, but unit prefixes being different is not suf…
-
## Description of the issue
In our meta issue #1875 we discussed, that we should specify our definition of `size` and that we may need `amount` as a quality e.g. for population count. So this issue…