-
Right now, it is quite the struggle to get the policy reasoner setup with Brane. It does not help that there is very little (or any?) documentation on it, by itself this would not be a problem (for me…
-
Based on Daniel's comments made in #39, it's become apparent that maybe a core assumption of the `policy-reasoner` framework may not hold in all cases: every reasoner has a configuration (e.g., policy…
-
Currently, we can submit a query with `:opts` that includes the type or reasoner we want to use (currently we only support datalog and owl2rl) and optionally include additional reasoner sources such a…
-
Right now, a request is rejected by default if no active policy is found. However, some reasoners might not have configurable policies. A slightly pedantic variant of this is of course the `no_op` rea…
-
The work part of the [policy reasoner effort](https://github.com/epi-project/policy-reasoner) is now at the point where integration with Brane may be possible. This issue exists to track the effort.
…
Lut99 updated
3 weeks ago
-
During the testing of the MGI import to GOC project, I noticed one of our gene-centric models (Cntn2) failed to be exported into MGI from Noctua. Further looking into the model shown: the model was mo…
-
The compliance framework tests each framework (jsonschema, pydantic, owl) ability to correctly validate different test cases. Some of these require extracts (pyshacl) and that's fine.
The way the o…
-
I ran the HermiT reasoner (version 1.4.3.456) on the defend-cco.owl ontology and it reported inconsistencies. I ran the reasoner through Protege. Half an hour and 30 inconsistencies later it was still…
-
-
Motivation: I would like to use the Rust version of @balhoff's Whelk, [whelk.rs](https://github.com/INCATools/whelk-rs)
Previously I was thinking the way to go would be to write a pyo3 wrapper onto…