-
Hi,
We have been using Shacl Play to generate some shapes and recently tried to generate cardinality shapes, i.e. the one that have min and max cardinality.
We saw this is extracted from restric…
-
We need to create both ontology and SHACL in order to use OpenLABEL for our extended metadata.
Right now, I already created an ontology-draft for OpenLABEL in separate branch, s.:
https://github.c…
-
The usage of `sh:name` and `sh:description` should be replaced with `rdfs:label` and `rdfs:comment` since their domain is limited to PropertyShape. Cf. https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/issues/145
-
Hi everyone,
There are initial cardinality constraints defined in the SHACL shapes (FE-DCAT-AP-SHACLshapes.ttl),
but it would be really helpful if someone could double check these?
Thank you in a…
-
I've long argued against including SHACL shapes with gist, since an upper ontology itself is not populated with data and SHACL by nature is implementation-specific. However, it now occurs to me that t…
-
Hi Thomas,
Here is a description of what I would think is a bug in the generation of shacl shapes from OWL.
To reproduce:
```
java -jar shacl-play-app-0.7.0-onejar.jar owl2shacl -i skos.owl -o…
-
Running `rdfsx --help` provides a list of subcommands, but they are not self-explanatory.
Ideally, next to each subcommand would be a one-line description introducing it, and when running `rdfsx SU…
-
I believe that checking the validity of templates should be included in the shapes. I'm not sure whether SPARQL's regular expressions allow for recursion, but it can be achieved by:
- removing the …
-
I have found it useful to be able to easily find Node Shapes for a given class. There are a handful of scenarios.
In one, an operation `expects` a class which is described by multiple shapes.
``…
-
We haven't looked at SHACL shapes for a while, and I'd guess they can take improvement. (@mgh128 what's your assessment?)
We also must address the following issues:
- #196 avoid `owl:sameAs` (@mko…