-
When assuming that LambdaNP >> v, then SMEFT-to-WET matching implies [relations among the ``bsll`` WET Wilson coefficients of the dim-6 operators](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1407.7044.pdf), see also [this …
-
I might not be doing things correctly, but it seems to me that setting the input parameters is not having any effect. In particular, if I do:
```python
import wilson
wc = {"uG_33": 1e-6}
myW…
-
I'm using the [SMEFTsim_U35_MwScheme_UFO.tar.gz](http://feynrules.irmp.ucl.ac.be/attachment/wiki/SMEFT/SMEFTsim_U35_MwScheme_UFO.tar.gz) from the FeynRules page (http://feynrules.irmp.ucl.ac.be/wiki/S…
-
Switching on Ced_1211 = 1 at 1 TeV and running to mZ, wilson finds Cee_1211 (mZ) = -0.00254, while doing the same with DsixTools one finds -0.0013, i.e. one half of that, which seems also to be consis…
-
I would be interested in reducing `smelli`'s computation times, and I think that the running of the RG equations and matching could be an easy starting point.
For reference, I am using the followin…
-
I would like to run SMEFT Wilson coefficients together with user-defined SM parameters, i.e. I don't want to use iteratively determined SM parameters but provide them myself at the high new physics sc…
-
Hi,
I am using HighPT to constrain some of the SMEFT operators. For a given process, let’s consider “di-muon-CMS.” I am obtaining 95% allowed regions for pairs of Wilson Coefficients (WCs). My questi…
-
The issue with this is potentially that the SM generation will miss diagrams that are only present with the EFT, but worth testing since generating LO processes with higher jet multiplicities and a la…
-
MSSM is handling it as a complex number
SMEFTatNLO is handling it as a real number
not sure why
-
At the moment, `smelli` assumes new physics (NP) being 'factorized' from the Standard Model (SM) dimension four terms and only entering coefficients of operators with dimension >= 5. However, models o…