-
At the moment, we have 23 content types. This is confusing at best, and a configuration headache. The only real reason to create different content types is when you have a functional distinction that …
-
### Which Umbraco version are you using? (Please write the *exact* version, example: 10.1.0)
13.0.3
### Bug summary
I noticed in a migrated project from Umbraco v8 -> v10 -> v12 -> v13, which…
-
We ought to support the following cases.
Raw upload content from an async file interface:
```python
import httpx
import trio
async def main():
async with httpx.AsyncClient() as client:…
-
### Motivation
Currently, the Migration Tool allows [migrating some types as reusable schemas](https://github.com/Kentico/xperience-by-kentico-kentico-migration-tool/blob/master/Migration.Toolkit.C…
-
-
Right now comments are fieldable entities, but the bundle for a comment is constrained by the content type they are attached to. Instead, we should be able to specify an arbitrary number of comment ty…
-
I was working on adding support for handling arbitrary content types in responses and wanted to run my idea by you to see if you'd want it included in Angelo.
As far as I can tell only content types …
-
### Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The `requestBody` specification for OpenAPI 3.0 (https://github.com/OAI/OpenAPI-Specification/blob/master/versions/3.0.0.md#reques…
-
> **For context, see:** [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/julep-ai/julep/blob/dev/CONTRIBUTING.md) and [cookbooks/README.md](https://github.com/julep-ai/julep/tree/dev/cookbooks)
## Overview
…
-
Hello,
I'd like to use interfake to simulate an API I'm implementing but I think I can't use more than one Content-Type for the same HTTP resource. In my case, I'd like to answer the same data but in…