-
For advanced typographic purposes, the fixed position of diacritical marks relative to base letter or baseline and the logical stacking behavior of them might not be sufficient. Therefore, it should b…
r12a updated
4 months ago
-
```
Truetype fonts typically do not contain glyphs for combining characters.
This makes using them quite useless:)
If it is feasible to overprint non-combining glyphs in one display position,
I'd sug…
-
```
Truetype fonts typically do not contain glyphs for combining characters.
This makes using them quite useless:)
If it is feasible to overprint non-combining glyphs in one display position,
I'd sug…
-
```
Truetype fonts typically do not contain glyphs for combining characters.
This makes using them quite useless:)
If it is feasible to overprint non-combining glyphs in one display position,
I'd sug…
-
```
Truetype fonts typically do not contain glyphs for combining characters.
This makes using them quite useless:)
If it is feasible to overprint non-combining glyphs in one display position,
I'd sug…
-
### Font
NotoSans-Regular.ttf
NotoSerif-Regular.ttf
### Where the font came from, and when
Site: https://noto-website-2.storage.googleapis.com/pkgs/NotoSans-unhinted.zip
Site: https://noto-webs…
-
## Defect Report
### Title
"Combining comma above right" character at wrong position"
### Font
NotoMono-Regular.ttf (correct)
NotoMono-Bold.ttf
NotoSans-BoldItalic.ttf
NotoSans-Bold.ttf
…
-
I know this isn't probably the right place to ask this, but I wasn't allowed to post into reddit r/fontforge ,and my experience with mailing lists is something that I wish to avoid as much as possible…
-
```
Truetype fonts typically do not contain glyphs for combining characters.
This makes using them quite useless:)
If it is feasible to overprint non-combining glyphs in one display position,
I'd sug…
-
```
Truetype fonts typically do not contain glyphs for combining characters.
This makes using them quite useless:)
If it is feasible to overprint non-combining glyphs in one display position,
I'd sug…