-
This library explicitly specifies RF-8949, so this request might be out of scope.
In the project I want to use cbor4ii for I'm stuck with [RFC-7049 Canonical CBOR key ordering](https://www.rfc-edit…
-
`resolution_wontfix` `type_defect` | by mahoney@nostrum.com
___
When superscripts are applied, the output has a noticeably larger space above the line containing the superscript as compared to…
-
Would be nice if we could cache compiled script to disk if it haven't changed.
-
## Request for Mozilla Position on an Emerging Web Specification
* Specification Title: Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)
* Specification or proposal URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/do…
-
`resolution_wontfix` `type_defect` | by mahoney@nostrum.com
___
In the table of contents of the PDF output, the subsections for appendices are listed at the same level as the main sections. Fo…
-
Hello,
Based on my earlier review comments: see below Section 9 proposed text. It adds these elements that I think are missing in the current -05 text. I hope that clarifies it.
Also it refers to…
-
https://cbor.io/spec.html states that [RFC-8949](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8949.html) is a new edition of RFC-7049 that describes the _same_ format, but with more explanation of topics that ha…
-
1. Abstract:
This document defines encoding rules for serializing configuration
data, state data, RPC input and RPC output, action input, action
output, notifications and the yang-data exten…
-
CDDL knows both names for "null" and "nil", but (especially with #117) a careless reader could read the "prepending a null" as "prepend the byte zero", which is not what is meant (given that the prepe…
-
That the CBOR world now has (at least) 3 different canonical formats to deal with is not particularly cool.
Question: Is anybody aware of a single FIDO implementation that is **not** compatible wit…