-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. build memcached with Sun Fire T2000 under Debian
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
The build fail with:
[...]
ok 25 - binary_replace
…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. build memcached with Sun Fire T2000 under Debian
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
The build fail with:
[...]
ok 25 - binary_replace
…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. build memcached with Sun Fire T2000 under Debian
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
The build fail with:
[...]
ok 25 - binary_replace
…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. build memcached with Sun Fire T2000 under Debian
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
The build fail with:
[...]
ok 25 - binary_replace
…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. build memcached with Sun Fire T2000 under Debian
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
The build fail with:
[...]
ok 25 - binary_replace
…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. build memcached with Sun Fire T2000 under Debian
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
The build fail with:
[...]
ok 25 - binary_replace
…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. build memcached with Sun Fire T2000 under Debian
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
The build fail with:
[...]
ok 25 - binary_replace
…
-
`crypto/ec/asm/ecp_nistz256-sparcv9.pl` has a bunch of functions that are local however do not follow the common naming scheme, namely the `__` prefix. This needs to be addressed across all (SPARC) as…
-
```
Hi,
On the debian build-machines, libproxy FTBFS because the url-test is failing on
both s390 and sparc:
make[1]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-sparc-linux-gnu'
Running tests...
/usr/b…
-
Hi, it seems like there's no support for `sparc` or `sparc64` architectures currently. What would be the steps to implement support for making syscalls on them? Would it be possible to incorporate the…