-
# Create A Challenge
## Title
Adoption of an open standard to facilitate creation, analysis and dissemination of Cyber Threat Intelligence [CTI].
## Category
- [X] Data
- [X] Document
- [X] …
-
We need to figure out how to support later versions of STIX 2 in the validator. It should probably default to the latest published version of the spec, with an option to set the version to validate ag…
clenk updated
5 years ago
-
The regex used in the validator and in python-stix2 should be consistent but is not currently. See https://github.com/oasis-open/cti-python-stix2/blob/master/stix2/properties.py#L21.
We'll also nee…
clenk updated
5 years ago
-
Location is not a valid STIX 2.X type. STIX-CIQ XML Tag (http://stix.mitre.org/extensions/Identity#CIQIdentity3.0-1) address is converted to a location type. Location type is failing STIX 2 validat…
-
STIX 1.1 Indicator Confidence is causing an error in STIX Validation.
[X] indicator--d847c839-38ab-48db-b0c6-c863fb940caa: Contains a reserved property ('confidence', 'severity', 'action', …
-
```python3
from stix2validator import validate_string, print_results
results = validate_string(sample.stix2)
print_results(results)
```
Produces:
File "lib/python3.6/site-pa…
-
Here is the screenshot:
![marking](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5939857/47416920-56c50f00-d7a9-11e8-87a7-aa9b1f82cdb7.PNG)
Source code:
![marking_class](https://user-images.githubuse…
-
Once the validator 1.0.1 was used with the elevator, each elevator message was output twice.
This temporary fix (https://github.com/oasis-open/cti-stix-elevator/commit/b7ce45baf17c0652afaf536415a37…
-
This is waiting on the 1.0 release of the validator.
-