-
### Describe your idea/feature/enhancement
With the recent announcement of "Mocked Service Integrations" for Step Functions, it would be great to have a new command (something like `sam local g…
-
- [x] I am running the latest version
- [x] I checked the documentation and found no answer
- [x] I checked to make sure that this issue has not already been filed
### Expected Behavior
Can mo…
-
This will be used for local testing/development.
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Run the code attached
2. Observe the stacktrace
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Expected: No java.lang.StackOverflowError
Observe…
-
```
The following test case can not pass with PowerMock 1.4.11 + Mockito 1.8.5 or
PowerMock 1.5.4 + Mockito 1.9.5. ClassCastException occurs.
@Test
public void test_mock_object_with_multiple…
-
```
There's a bug in EasyMock that treats methods called in the ctor as mocked even
though they're not. In these cases it would be good to simply be able to
suppress the methods called in the ctor. …
-
```
The following test case can not pass with PowerMock 1.4.11 + Mockito 1.8.5 or
PowerMock 1.5.4 + Mockito 1.9.5. ClassCastException occurs.
@Test
public void test_mock_object_with_multiple…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Run the code attached
2. Observe the stacktrace
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Expected: No java.lang.StackOverflowError
Observe…
-
```
There's a bug in EasyMock that treats methods called in the ctor as mocked even
though they're not. In these cases it would be good to simply be able to
suppress the methods called in the ctor. …
-
```
There's a bug in EasyMock that treats methods called in the ctor as mocked even
though they're not. In these cases it would be good to simply be able to
suppress the methods called in the ctor. …