-
Right now, the test coverage across the different packages is rather low:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1827373/51850277-b808fb00-2321-11e9-970d-8084a69739f1.png)
I'd like t…
-
Initial focus is on e2e integration tests; note below on limitations of jest --coverage of worker_threads.
-
### Feature Description
Working on [this PR](https://github.com/grafana/k6-operator/pull/291), I have tried to add some integration test for this changes but there isn't any wait to do it with curren…
-
Set up performance benchmarking and expand unit test coverage for critical portions of the SWMM code. The following areas will be targeted initially for expanding the unit tests:
- SWMM output libr…
-
### Component
Forge
### Describe the feature you would like
Currently, the forge fuzz testing and invariant testing don’t support coverage-guided fuzzing, which could generally improve the fuzzing …
-
After setting up Sonar and code coverage, the overall coverage is 70.4% according to jacoco and Sonar. Here is the coverage reported by Sonar as of this writing:
| Class | Coverage | Uncovered Line…
-
### Expected Behavior
When running `connectedCheck` in an Android module with code coverage enabled, Jacoco report task (`createDebugAndroidTestCoverageReport`) should wait for the end of Android con…
-
The current test coverage of CsWinRt seems to exclude some important scenarios. There's a need for a robust testing plan and test cases that can cover most of the APIs. I see the following scenarios a…
-
Any new PR should be accompanied by relevant tests. However, large portions of the libraries are as of yet untested. Any PRs improving test coverage of existing code are welcome.
Keep the following…
-
### Description
Here, I have clicked on an icon and I have a dropdown menu of labels next to where I clicked:
![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/025d60d6-8c2e-47ab-a534-74ac68ddc2…