-
I'd like to submit a pull request but I can only do that if this project is licensed under a license with few restrictions such as Apache2 or MIT
-
This is neat! It would be great if you added a license file that encourages opensource collaboration on this stuff - apache2 etc
-
Hi,
I´d like to perhaps use this project in another library.
However, I cannot do that unless I have a clear guideline on under which conditions I can use this.
I would suggest something like…
-
```
Hi,
while in non-corporate/OSS environment, this WTFPL might seem somewhat funny...
in commercial environment it creates some problems. Although it lets you do
"everything", it is not an accept…
-
```
Hi,
while in non-corporate/OSS environment, this WTFPL might seem somewhat funny...
in commercial environment it creates some problems. Although it lets you do
"everything", it is not an accept…
-
Expectations
- Code should be accompanied with full unit tests coverage
- Any third party libraries are used should have permissive license like MIT or Apache2
- Sorting should work in both ways …
-
Can I kindly ask you to change the license to something less restrictive?
Dual MIT/Apache2 would be great. Example: https://github.com/status-im/nim-chronicles
Thanks!
-
**Update 04/18/2014:**
> After discussing with the team, we will keep the status quo for now and push this potential license update to 3.1.0. More research and feedback is required before a license c…
-
#### Question description
Sorry but I find it confusing to understand if self hosted version of sourcegraph is free or not?
I see it has apache2 license (https://github.com/sourcegraph/sourcegra…
jkjha updated
9 months ago
-
The defect may already be reported! Please search for the defect before creating one.
### Current Behavior:
amqp-client use three licenses: MPL2.0 Apache 2.0 GPL2.0
https://github.com/rabbi…