-
Would the constitution be easier to understand and flow more intuitively if the Anchor Circle definition and clauses were moved into Article 1 on Org Structure, in a section after defining Circles, Ci…
-
As a Ratifier, I'd like the constitution to include clear default processes for how partners can be brought into and removed from my organization - ones that scale to any size company and don't requir…
-
The Tactical format can be changed already, and I sense that Governance Check-in / Closing round could also be adapted to better support the companies culture. I don't see what harm would come from al…
-
I've seen several cases now (one recently in HolacracyOne) where a role took on some activity because someone asked and they thought it maybe/vaguely fit their role's purpose, but where the Circle Lea…
-
It seems "strategies and priorities" are an implicit domain of the Lead Link.
see thread https://community.holacracy.org/topic/are-strategies-and-priorities-an-implicit-domain-of-the-lead-link
I'd…
-
There's often some confusion with the term "Individual Action" - the word "Action" is in there, but it's not related to the concept of a "Next-Action" or really even a specific action of any sort. So…
-
In v5, a role can create its own cross-role circle with another role, and that circle can then add accountabilities to the founding roles. For consistency, that means a role really should be able to …
-
As a partner or a role-filler, I'd like an effective and simple mechanism to define agreements I'd like from partners, including a way to make some agreements required for partnership, so that I can m…
-
Hi Brian,
We've encountered a case where someone brought a tension underlining the criteria “clearly reflect activity that is already happening” of its proposal. The proposal wasn't about that pers…
-
As the Lead Link of a Circle that has some processes and property to govern that are also highly intertwined with an external party (perhaps a circle within my organization, or one in another organiza…