-
```
I would not be surprised if you have probably thought about it already.
I think, that any serialization may be regarded as consisting of two logical
phases:
1. Convert the given object graph int…
-
```
I would not be surprised if you have probably thought about it already.
I think, that any serialization may be regarded as consisting of two logical
phases:
1. Convert the given object graph int…
-
```
I would not be surprised if you have probably thought about it already.
I think, that any serialization may be regarded as consisting of two logical
phases:
1. Convert the given object graph int…
-
```
I would not be surprised if you have probably thought about it already.
I think, that any serialization may be regarded as consisting of two logical
phases:
1. Convert the given object graph int…
-
As per #238 `int`s, `int32`s, and `int64`s aren't zigzag encoded by default. Add a tag such that developers can still zigzag encode. If they need to encode ints which often contain negative numbers th…
-
```
Please, consider using google protocol buffers to allow easier evolution and
implementation.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `lehph...@gmail.com` on 12 Sep 2010 at 9:48
-
```
Please, consider using google protocol buffers to allow easier evolution and
implementation.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `lehph...@gmail.com` on 12 Sep 2010 at 9:48
-
```
Please, consider using google protocol buffers to allow easier evolution and
implementation.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `lehph...@gmail.com` on 12 Sep 2010 at 9:48
-
```
Please, consider using google protocol buffers to allow easier evolution and
implementation.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `lehph...@gmail.com` on 12 Sep 2010 at 9:48
-
```
Please, consider using google protocol buffers to allow easier evolution and
implementation.
```
Original issue reported on code.google.com by `lehph...@gmail.com` on 12 Sep 2010 at 9:48