-
```python
dev = qml.device("lightning.qubit", wires=2)
def my_quantum_transform(tape: qml.tape.QuantumTape) -> (Sequence[qml.tape.QuantumTape], Callable):
tape1 = tape
tape2 = qml.tape.Q…
-
### Expected behavior
The expectation value obtained for the tensor product of an observable containing terms using `qml.Hermitian` is correct.
### Actual behavior
Incorrect result.
### Additional…
-
Hello! Thank you for sharing your code! How this issue can be solved? Thank you in advance
-
### Expected behavior
User-specified dtypes on the device are not considered in a wide variety of cases. The ones detailed below are just specific ones found by chance, a more systematic think-thro…
-
### Expected behavior
Measuring `Hadamard` and a Pauli Observable together on the same wire at the end of a circuit is well behaved.
### Actual behavior
An error raised which mentions that a…
-
### Expected behavior
We expect that when a non hermitian observable is passed into the measurement process, a reasonable error message is displayed which informs the user that they cannot perform …
-
The AQT service hosted at gateway-portal.aqt.eu has been deactivated and is replaced by a new solution. Usage of the current version of the PennyLane-AQT plugin is therefore no longer possible!
The…
-
Hi,
I'm opening an issue because I don't see the "Discussion" section. I strongly suggest enabling it, to allow a better interaction with users and contributors 😄
Going to the actual content, I'…
-
### Expected behavior
```
dev = qml.device("lightning.qubit", wires=nwires, shots=[(10, 1), (10, 2)])
@qml.qnode(dev)
def circuit():
return qml.state()
```
It should output
```
[[1.+…
-
I see in your paper that.
This work was run on a quantum computer
Forgive my ignorance, I just came across this concept.
I want to know if I can run your demo if I don't have a quantum computer.
…