-
The LICENSE file contains the MIT license (which talks about "software"). The paper itself states that it is released under CC-BY-NC-SA. So which one is it?
-
Przynajmniej część licencji jest oznaczona błędnie.
Przykład:
[„Z głową w sieci – Fundacja dla Kultury”](http://cybernauci.edu.pl/z-glowa-w-sieci/) jest oznaczone jako „creative commons - na tych sa…
-
The CC namespace is used to declare the license for a channel or an item.
Example:
```xml
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/
```
Spec: https://www.rssboard.org/creative-commons…
-
We have had some questions about to what extent LMFDB pages are copyrighted. This is analogous I guess to Wikipedia. Probably that means the whole site (images, webpages, ...) should be covered by C…
-
cc-by-sa-nc is not free. Thus we can't integrate your app in the FOSS Market F-Droid. To be included, please change it.
http://f-droid.org/forums/topic/dev-tools-urlopener/#post-4619
-
Hi Alessandro! First of all, congrats for your icons! They are amazing!
I've noticed a small, but perhaps significant, conflict in licensing terms: you're using [CC-BY-SA 4.0](http://creativecommons.…
-
@robjhyndman thoughts on licensing? -- maybe https://chooser-beta.creativecommons.org
-
https://github.com/piercing-index/cloud-vulnerabilities has scoring for cloud vulnerabilities.
-
There are lots of photos on the site that belong to their original creators. Some can be used with permission (everything from https://github.com/philipsharp/afieldguidetoelephpants is CC BY-NC-SA 4.…
-
Patchouli is currently under the `CC BY-NC-SA 3.0` license for all of its code and assets.
This is problematic because CC licenses are bad for code (search the web for many articles on the topic), …