-
Thank you for your work!
I have a question about license. Your code is licensed under GPLv3. But what about your pre-trained models? Are they licensed under GPLv3, too?
-
package.json says the license is `GPLv3` but LICENSE is `Apache-2.0`.
-
**Project description**
Git gui client for KDE
![img](https://cdn.kde.org/screenshots/kommit/kommit.png)
**Metadata**
* homepage URL: https://apps.kde.org/kommit
* source URL: https://inven…
-
Is the file GPLv3 only
or
GPLv3 or any later version?
-
Hi, I'm packaging gst-vosk for Fedora and noticed a difference between the license information and the spec file. The gst-vosk GitHub repository https://github.com/PhilippeRo/gst-vosk# mentions an LGP…
-
`#禁止抄袭、套作、借鉴、或用于商业用途`
GPLv3 抄袭,套作,借鉴,商业用途都可以,但是前提是开源并标注来源。🤣
-
### Model Name
Pharmacophore-guided molecular generation
### Model Description
Based on a molecule's pharmacophore, this model generates new molecules de-novo to match the pharmacophore. A graph ne…
-
#### Summary
The [LICENSE file ](https://github.com/canonical/microk8s/blob/master/LICENSE)shows Apache 2.0, but there are several files listing GPL v3
Example: https://github.com/canonical/microk…
-
Hello,
Is the dual licensing meant as 'AND' (you have to fulfill both BSD and GPLv3) or an 'OR' (you either have to fulfill BSD or GPLv3).
If the argument is the AND, the BSD license is not requ…
Skeen updated
6 years ago
-
Hi Pete,
Just wanted to understand your position on the license that would apply on the code generated by TFMin. The GPLv3 FAQ [here ](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#GPLOutput)and [he…