-
Split from #1703
This issue covers adding Windows support to drcachesim. Primarily this means implementing named pipe support for Windows. If Windows named pipes cannot handle multiple writers, th…
-
```
Reading about local IPC on Windows leads me to idea that Named Pipes is not the
transport should be used where Unix Domain sockets are on Unix. Other, most
probably faster, should be.
ALPC and U…
-
### Describe the bug
Upgrade failed from 1.44.1~ynh2 to 1.44.3~ynh1
### Context
- Hardware: VPS bought online
- YunoHost version: 11.2.10.1
- I have access to my server: Through SSH | throu…
-
* .NET Core Version:
v5.0.0-preview.7
* Have you experienced this same bug with .NET Framework?:
No
**Problem description:**
The implementation of `WindowsFormsApplicationBase.IsSingleInsta…
-
```
Reading about local IPC on Windows leads me to idea that Named Pipes is not the
transport should be used where Unix Domain sockets are on Unix. Other, most
probably faster, should be.
ALPC and U…
-
the named pipe feature is not supported by Python in windows; however, it appears to be supported in powershell (reference needed). this is being researched along with alternative IPC tools.
refere…
-
Validate
- Unix domain socket
- Named pipes (only windows?)
Note for containers:
Containers need to share sock files via volumes
-
I implemented a naive pushback example (https://github.com/socketry/falcon/tree/main/examples/pushback) but it has some quirks:
1. I had to implement an external loop to check for free slots (this …
-
@rokonec suggested this idea during our planning meetings. I'll leave it up to you to fill in this section with what we might be able to expect out of this, and what the path forward is here.
-
```
Reading about local IPC on Windows leads me to idea that Named Pipes is not the
transport should be used where Unix Domain sockets are on Unix. Other, most
probably faster, should be.
ALPC and U…