-
bisect_ppx is an odd ppx rewriter because you only want it active when you're measuring coverage. Usually when you're running your test suite. Dually, the tests only require the bisect ppx runtime whe…
-
```
$ make test.byte
js_of_eliom -w +A-4-7-9-37-38-39-41-42-44-45-48 -jsopt +base/runtime.js -ppx -ppx "ocsigen-i18n-rewriter
Test09_i18n" -c -package lwt_ppx -package js_of_ocaml-ppx -package js…
MdeLv updated
4 years ago
-
I am trying to understand the cause of a segfault in ppx_deriving (reported by @kit-ty-kate) since we migrated to ppxlib, see https://github.com/ocaml-ppx/ppx_deriving/pull/210#issuecomment-632330283 …
-
I couldn't find an issue on this tracked on GitHub so I made one here.
Reports of "invalid signature" errors when using the offline client SDK to generate transactions and feed them on the 3.2b tes…
bkase updated
4 years ago
-
Sedlex is the successor to ulex and should be preferred.
Excerpt from the sedlex project page:
> sedlex is the successor of the ulex project. Contrary to ulex which was implemented as a Camlp4 s…
-
Hi,
On [this project](https://git.zapashcanon.fr/zapashcanon/dddddml/src/branch/dunesegfault) (make sure you are on the `dunesegfault` branch), when running `dune build @all` I've got:
```txt
I…
-
Here is the error I get:
```shell
$ dune-deps
Error: Cannot parse dune file ./_opam/.opam-switch/sources/dune.2.4.0/test/blackbox-tests/test-cases/dune-ppx-driver-system/driver-tests/dune: exceptio…
-
**Original bug ID:** 7778
**Reporter:** jfehrle
**Status:** new
**Resolution:** open
**Priority:** normal
**Severity:** feature
**Version:** 4.06.0
**Category:** language features
**Monitored by:** @d…
-
When using OCaml 4.04.0 with this line
```
function
| Opam_bulk_build_diff_key.(Remote {o;n;ocaml_version;distro}) ->
Fmt.strf "Diffing %d -> %d packages (%s-%a)"
(List…
-
## Desired Behavior
It would help if there was a way to specify flags to pass to ppx rewriters in a profile-dependent way. As far as I know, these flags need to be included in the `preprocess` fi…