-
Similar to "Ensure we support content types of whitehall assets #418". We'll need to ensure we're setting the correct `Content-Type` (or at least matching the `Content-Type` set by Whitehall) once we'…
-
When I go to http://www.ospc.org/taxbrain/29588/ and click on the "Distribution Table" button and then on the "Income Deciles" button, I get these (obviously incorrect) results:
![screen shot 2018-…
-
### Environment
Tested with JRuby 9.1.12.0 and JRuby 9.1.13.0 and compared to MRI 2.3.1
### Expected Behavior
* A Datetime value should be able to be converted to a Time and back to a Datetim…
-
So users understand what financial information is being presented, we should update "cycle" to "period" on candidate profile pages.
The problem here is `cycle` has a very specific meaning. We are …
-
The "Build Table" feature at the bottom of the TaxBrain static results page is very nice. I've used it off and on over the past year mostly by building a table and viewing it and maybe making a note …
-
The following message was received from TaxBrain when uploading reform and assumption files that have been successfully uploaded for many months (see the history of the `tax-calculator/file-upload-tes…
-
The problem is that `DateTime#utc` now returns `Time` instead of `DateTime`:
```
def utc
utc = new_offset(0)
Time.utc(
utc.year, utc.month, utc.day,
utc.hour, utc.min, utc.sec + ut…
-
Before 1873, it is partially based on Chinese calendar. Investigation is needed for this ancient part of history. See also:
http://www.yukikurete.de/nengo_calc.htm
http://wiki.samurai-archives.com…
-
Current stack allows to write this new syntax:
```
extra-deps:
- git: git@github.com:NorfairKing/validity.git
commit: a86dd3e4830c14c056a0d5d8712864d395d25b2a
```
the old syntax for this w…
-
The "Macroeconomic Elasticities" dynamic analysis does not work.
When I specify a pop-the-cap reform beginning in 2018, the [static results](http://www.ospc.org/taxbrain/9967/) look sensible.
Bu…