-
Hi team,
we at DE-CIX (and probably every other IXP as well) filter out our own peer peering LAN prefixes (i.e. peering lan hijacks) at our route servers. I'm interested in doing that for peering L…
-
While the summary of #515 seems to be a lack of consensus to "Remove Virtual IXPs", and #611 to "Require IXs to have at least one facility" is still open..
However there appear to be IX records in …
-
Although IPv6 is around for two decades some networks still have different routing policies for IPv4 and IPv6. To support this a new field "IRR as-set/route-set IPv6" resp. irr_as_set6 would be needed…
-
[I've edited the below and title, because the spec makes clear that missing IP assignments only result in an email to a network and not to the IX too.]
The email (example at https://beta.peeringdb.…
-
If a network's IPv6 flag for "Protocols Supported" is unchecked, we should not create tickets/hints/emails about a missing IPv6 address.
Conflicted addresses should still be worked toward resolutio…
-
There's been a bit of online discussion about the `in_dfz` field. The tl;dr on this is that it's made fully redundant by RPKI, and that peeringdb data quality would be improved by removing the field.…
-
Prior to engaging the IX-F importer in production, on beta we need to enable the importer flag for all IXes that have a IX-F JSON URL configured, along with testing the full importer against all of th…
-
As per discusion in #308 I'm creating a separate ticket.
If a network is listed in IX-F export as member of the IX, but no entry exists in PDB for this network, the record is discarded. In our IX, …
-
El contenido de esta issue se actualizará con las preguntas que se reciban. Para formular una nueva pregunta, responder a esta issue.
El link inicial a la reunión de zoom estaba incorrecto. Ya fue …
-
1. if you want to automate and process, the API is the only way to do this
2. all information which is in the user GUI should also be accessible via the API