-
-
```
Please investigate and address the following warning reported by VisualC++ 2010
(check that there's no safety issue).
1>c:\dev\mili\include\binary_streams.h(324): warning C4996:
'std::basic_str…
-
```
Please investigate and address the following warning reported by VisualC++ 2010
(check that there's no safety issue).
1>c:\dev\mili\include\binary_streams.h(324): warning C4996:
'std::basic_str…
-
It's my understanding that `` is still a [wrapper](https://github.com/microsoft/STL/blob/ad80eb79ba4953e7529d15b1bc8d0b540150bf7d/stl/inc/fstream#L780) around a standard C `FILE`. Why doesn't the Micr…
-
In C, a function may be declared without explicitly giving the number of parameters, as explained in [this stackexchange article](https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/286490/what-is…
-
Per https://github.com/mapbox/windows-builds/commit/477c675c36a790711080e18ba66947feaed8c039#commitcomment-18957469
/cc @BergWerkGIS
-
Full name of submitter (unless configured in github; will be published with the issue): Jim X
[expr.new] p16 says:
> For arrays of char, unsigned char, and std::byte, the difference between th…
-
[basic.lookup.argdep] p1 says
> When the postfix-expression **in a function call** ([expr.call]) is an unqualified-id, and unqualified lookup ([basic.lookup.unqual]) for the name in the unqualified-i…
-
The subclause [basic.scope.pdecl] does not explicitly mention the locus of a **function-definition**. Presumably, [basic.scope.pdecl] p1 intends to cover this case but it is incorrect
> The [locus](h…
-
With clang-upc on Solaris/x86 and gcc or cc (Sun/Oracle compiler) as the back-end compiler, I see failures on `upc_io_test.upc`:
```
[benchmarks/upc_io_test] FAILED: UPC-To-C Translation or Link erro…