-
```
It would be nice to have startsWith(string s, sub or regex) supported instead
of just startsWith(string s, sub). Same for endsWith().
Interestingly, startsWith(value,/\d.*/) does not give a syn…
-
@szollin - Can you help look into this issue and share your view.
OS Distro: Debian Bookworm
LKP: master branch
Arch: armhf
`hackbench::
==> ERROR:☼ hackbench is not available for the '' architec…
-
```
It would be nice to have startsWith(string s, sub or regex) supported instead
of just startsWith(string s, sub). Same for endsWith().
Interestingly, startsWith(value,/\d.*/) does not give a syn…
-
```
It would be nice to have startsWith(string s, sub or regex) supported instead
of just startsWith(string s, sub). Same for endsWith().
Interestingly, startsWith(value,/\d.*/) does not give a syn…
-
```
It would be nice to have startsWith(string s, sub or regex) supported instead
of just startsWith(string s, sub). Same for endsWith().
Interestingly, startsWith(value,/\d.*/) does not give a syn…
-
```
It would be nice to have startsWith(string s, sub or regex) supported instead
of just startsWith(string s, sub). Same for endsWith().
Interestingly, startsWith(value,/\d.*/) does not give a syn…
-
```
It would be nice to have startsWith(string s, sub or regex) supported instead
of just startsWith(string s, sub). Same for endsWith().
Interestingly, startsWith(value,/\d.*/) does not give a syn…
-
```
It would be nice to have startsWith(string s, sub or regex) supported instead
of just startsWith(string s, sub). Same for endsWith().
Interestingly, startsWith(value,/\d.*/) does not give a syn…
-
```
It would be nice to have startsWith(string s, sub or regex) supported instead
of just startsWith(string s, sub). Same for endsWith().
Interestingly, startsWith(value,/\d.*/) does not give a syn…
-
```
It would be nice to have startsWith(string s, sub or regex) supported instead
of just startsWith(string s, sub). Same for endsWith().
Interestingly, startsWith(value,/\d.*/) does not give a syn…