-
As defined in [article 1.3](https://github.com/holacracyone/Holacracy-Constitution/blob/master/Holacracy-Constitution.md#13-circles) a circle is a role. This is a major shift and conceptual simplifica…
-
I see there's 3 times the usage of “people” in the Constitution. While the term Partners is clarified in the Preamble, and the term “external parties” which is used is pretty explicit to me, I'd like …
-
articles 1.1a and 5.2.3 both describe what a purpose is but use slightly different language.
recognizing that for the purpose of an organization you should also consider as described the constraints t…
-
I was working on some internal training and had a realization that might just complicate things but might be worth exploring so I thought I'd throw it out there. I love the way the new constitution ge…
-
Tension :
• Many people take a long time to understand the logic of the structure, i.e. holarchy
• Many people have a hard time going from "I work for myself and my boss" to "I work for my role, my …
-
Bonjour et bravo pour votre travail !
J'aurais aimé imprimer la constitution pour la lire tranquillement au soleil, mais malheureusement la génération du fichier ne fonctionne pas (gitprint dispo dan…
-
Is there proof that the current constitutional constraint against Lead Link being Rep Link is in fact needed? I am unsure and would like to pose the question and make the pitch.
I am the Lead Link …
-
Here's a suggestion I got recently and have seen a few times now:
> replace "objection" with "integration request"... objection has a negative connotation and a "me vs. you" feeling to it, whereas "i…
-
My objective here is to open a space for deepening and integrating different perspectives and polarities in regard with The Role Supporter concept.
During our session (see end of [recording](https://…
-
A few organizations/circles have wanted to add custom fields to the definition of a Role/Circle or a Policy - e.g. adding a "Customer" field on a role. Perhaps a field like this would initially be us…