-
When upgrading the Wolverine NuGet packages - `WolverineFx`, `WolverineFx.EntityFrameworkCore`, `WolverineFx.RabbitMQ` and `WolverineFx.SqlServer` in a .NET Web Api application to a version higher th…
p-fx updated
10 months ago
-
Hi!
First of all - BIG thanks for making real great working software, this is how Microsoft should have done it in the first place with BinaryFormatter.
There are only a couple of issues that I …
-
Hello Orleans community,
I'd like to propose a change in the underlying serialization mechanism of Orleans from protobuf-net to MemoryPack.
Rationale:
Performance: MemoryPack is a serializati…
-
I had an issue in my code that raised the error:
> MemoryPack.MemoryPackSerializationException : is not registered in this provider
After some digging I found the reason for it to be because I …
-
Fzcpp updated
10 months ago
-
Great work, thank you. We see impressive performance.
Is there a way to allow static constructor in the original partial class that is annotated with [MemoryPackable]?
Or a way to execute user c…
-
### Checks
- [X] I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.
- [X] I am using the latest version of Flow Launcher.
### Problem Description
I was attempting to set up the Explore…
-
Hi, I am reporting that I have encountered the following problem when communicating using MemoryPack.
There is a discrepancy between the results of serializing tuple in Unity and .Net, which can caus…
-
There was already issue about that:
https://github.com/Cysharp/MemoryPack/issues/119
The solution was to go to the csproj file and change from `MemoryPack` to `MemoryPack.Core`.
Unfortunate…
g3rzi updated
11 months ago
-
Hi! I've been evaluating MemoryPack for my next project, and I saw this line: https://github.com/Cysharp/MemoryPack/blob/main/src/MemoryPack.Core/Internal/MemoryMarshalEx.cs#L20
If I understood eve…