-
**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
We need to support the s3 storage environment to support the aws environment.
**Describe the solution you'd like**
You need to c…
-
It would be handy to support S3-compatible systems for storing photos rather than local storage.
koehn updated
5 years ago
-
### Description
We are using docker distribution version 2.8.2 in our service. When big images are pushed to s3 storage, half of the image is uploaded and remaining half doesnt because of space issu…
-
### Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I would like to use more than a single S3 bucket in my amplify project.
### Describe the solution you'd like
Say I have two…
-
I am using Percona Everest 0.10.1. Installation using an RKE-1 kubernetes cluster set up over a bunch of OpenStack VMs established using Rancher went successfully.
Percona Everest services are runn…
-
Add the ability to use S3 as the storage backend rather than just local disk
-
## Bug Description
When using a local directory for storing the db-data content, you can't login after fresh setup.
The hint here doesn't work: https://twenty.com/developers/section/self-hosting/…
-
With the ever increasing flow of information I was wondering if there are any thoughts on using / supporting Active Storage in SEEK?
For example using S3 to enable the storage of seek data into a …
-
Hi! Probably it would be great to use S3 (or any S3-compatible) object storage for storing state files. This should offload Postgres (which is not a good option for large JSON) and allow to store stat…
-
Dear Mr. Rosdahl,
a few weeks ago, I implemented a secondary storage backend for S3 storage. The code is currently in proof-of-concept status and lives [here](https://github.com/m-ildefons/ccache/t…