-
```
Ideally these classes would be removed, but a better solution needs to be
addressed. Currently there are the following options:
1. Drop support for .NET Framework 3.5 Client Profile
2. Provide d…
-
```
Ideally these classes would be removed, but a better solution needs to be
addressed. Currently there are the following options:
1. Drop support for .NET Framework 3.5 Client Profile
2. Provide d…
-
**TEST**
``` javascript
promise.any([
promise.reject('stop')
]).
then(function () {
}, function (reason) {
console.log(reason);
});
```
**OUTPUT**
```
Warning: a promise was…
-
```
Ideally these classes would be removed, but a better solution needs to be
addressed. Currently there are the following options:
1. Drop support for .NET Framework 3.5 Client Profile
2. Provide d…
-
```
Ideally these classes would be removed, but a better solution needs to be
addressed. Currently there are the following options:
1. Drop support for .NET Framework 3.5 Client Profile
2. Provide d…
-
```
Ideally these classes would be removed, but a better solution needs to be
addressed. Currently there are the following options:
1. Drop support for .NET Framework 3.5 Client Profile
2. Provide d…
-
```
Ideally these classes would be removed, but a better solution needs to be
addressed. Currently there are the following options:
1. Drop support for .NET Framework 3.5 Client Profile
2. Provide d…
-
```
Ideally these classes would be removed, but a better solution needs to be
addressed. Currently there are the following options:
1. Drop support for .NET Framework 3.5 Client Profile
2. Provide d…
-
```
Ideally these classes would be removed, but a better solution needs to be
addressed. Currently there are the following options:
1. Drop support for .NET Framework 3.5 Client Profile
2. Provide d…
-
```
Ideally these classes would be removed, but a better solution needs to be
addressed. Currently there are the following options:
1. Drop support for .NET Framework 3.5 Client Profile
2. Provide d…