-
```
Ideally these classes would be removed, but a better solution needs to be
addressed. Currently there are the following options:
1. Drop support for .NET Framework 3.5 Client Profile
2. Provide d…
-
```
Ideally these classes would be removed, but a better solution needs to be
addressed. Currently there are the following options:
1. Drop support for .NET Framework 3.5 Client Profile
2. Provide d…
-
```
Ideally these classes would be removed, but a better solution needs to be
addressed. Currently there are the following options:
1. Drop support for .NET Framework 3.5 Client Profile
2. Provide d…
-
```
Ideally these classes would be removed, but a better solution needs to be
addressed. Currently there are the following options:
1. Drop support for .NET Framework 3.5 Client Profile
2. Provide d…
-
```
Ideally these classes would be removed, but a better solution needs to be
addressed. Currently there are the following options:
1. Drop support for .NET Framework 3.5 Client Profile
2. Provide d…
-
```
Ideally these classes would be removed, but a better solution needs to be
addressed. Currently there are the following options:
1. Drop support for .NET Framework 3.5 Client Profile
2. Provide d…
-
Hello,
I noticed that a secret key is in your code repository. Is it a valid key?
The safest and recommended way of using the secret key is to encrypt it and store it directly on the server and decry…
-
```
Ideally these classes would be removed, but a better solution needs to be
addressed. Currently there are the following options:
1. Drop support for .NET Framework 3.5 Client Profile
2. Provide d…
-
```
Ideally these classes would be removed, but a better solution needs to be
addressed. Currently there are the following options:
1. Drop support for .NET Framework 3.5 Client Profile
2. Provide d…
-
```
Ideally these classes would be removed, but a better solution needs to be
addressed. Currently there are the following options:
1. Drop support for .NET Framework 3.5 Client Profile
2. Provide d…