-
-
```
PSD files appear to contain at least two types of metadata that is already
supported: XMP and Photoshop.
Here is a reference to the format:
http://www.fileformat.info/format/psd/egff.htm
```
O…
-
```
PSD files appear to contain at least two types of metadata that is already
supported: XMP and Photoshop.
Here is a reference to the format:
http://www.fileformat.info/format/psd/egff.htm
```
O…
-
### Description of the problem
Hello,
I discovered a bug in the sensor name when using mne.viz.plot_topomap.
The values on the topomap remain correct but not the names; which can lead to confusio…
-
Hi @reanthony-usgs and @aringler-usgs . I wanted to update you both on progress.
I ran the spectral calculation last week and now have all the corrected PSDs and CSDs for the TA in Alaska for 2018…
-
```
PSD files appear to contain at least two types of metadata that is already
supported: XMP and Photoshop.
Here is a reference to the format:
http://www.fileformat.info/format/psd/egff.htm
```
O…
-
```
PSD files appear to contain at least two types of metadata that is already
supported: XMP and Photoshop.
Here is a reference to the format:
http://www.fileformat.info/format/psd/egff.htm
```
O…
-
```
PSD files appear to contain at least two types of metadata that is already
supported: XMP and Photoshop.
Here is a reference to the format:
http://www.fileformat.info/format/psd/egff.htm
```
O…
-
Can you briefly explain the differences between DFA and PSD estimators? You mentioned that PSD is highly sensitive to low frequency trends and DFA is more robust to trends, so does that necessarily me…
-
Getting a bug with the main `make_mdb_df` function when running with the training dataset.
```r
path_msd % glamr::return_latest("TRAINING")
meta