-
**Note from the teaching team:** This bug was reported during the _Part II (Evaluating Documents)_ stage of the PE. **You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.**
Th…
-
**Note from the teaching team:** This bug was reported during the _Part II (Evaluating Documents)_ stage of the PE. **You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.**
# …
-
**Note from the teaching team:** This bug was reported during the _Part II (Evaluating Documents)_ stage of the PE. **You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.**
Th…
-
**Note from the teaching team:** This bug was reported during the _Part II (Evaluating Documents)_ stage of the PE. **You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.**
(s…
-
**Note from the teaching team:** This bug was reported during the _Part II (Evaluating Documents)_ stage of the PE. **You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.**
ex…
-
**Note from the teaching team:** This bug was reported during the _Part II (Evaluating Documents)_ stage of the PE. **You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.**
![…
-
Unmentioned multiplicity of name, address, date, content, rating fields.
Are they compulsory? Optional?
![image.png](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thamruicong/pe/main/files/5ab9fa06-1029-4fec-b0…
-
**Note from the teaching team:** This bug was reported during the _Part II (Evaluating Documents)_ stage of the PE. **You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.**
![…
-
**Note from the teaching team:** This bug was reported during the _Part II (Evaluating Documents)_ stage of the PE. **You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.**
Pa…
-
**Note from the teaching team:** This bug was reported during the _Part II (Evaluating Documents)_ stage of the PE. **You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.**
![…