-
`component_MailArchive: User Interface` `resolution_fixed` `type_defect` | by rcross@amsl.com
___
Adam Roach:
The first very quick feedback I have is that it would be nice if the filters on t…
-
`component_MailArchive: User Interface` `resolution_fixed` `type_defect` | by rcross@amsl.com
___
Adam Roach:
The first very quick feedback I have is that it would be nice if the filters on t…
-
`component_Version 2 cli` `resolution_fixed` `type_defect` | by bo.burman@ericsson.com
___
For multiple drafts, I fail to get listed as co-author in references of those drafts, although the ad…
-
Reclamation of code points here was eventually successful. Might talk to some mmusic folks about the history there.
-
> A popular convention is that an individual submission seeking adoption by a working group will **include the working group's acronym just after the second component.** For example, a person or group…
-
### Prerequisites
- [X] I verified that this is not a filter issue (MUST be reported at [filter issue tracker](https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uAssets/issues))
- [X] This is not a [support issue o…
-
Sections 11 and A.7 should be checked to ensure that
1. all references in the text are listed
2. references are properly categorized as normative and informative.
-
per @cdh4u, seems like answers should now be handled differently:
> The initial offer is as before, i.e., you assign a unique address, SDP attributes etc to each bundled m- section.
>
> But, in t…
-
44) [rfced] Sections 5.9, 5.10, 5.11, and 6:
RFC 8843 [I-D.ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation] does not have a
Section 8.2 or a Section 10.2. We have updated these to refer to 7.2
and 9.2, respective…
-
26) [rfced] Section 5.2.1: Please confirm that this citation is
correct; we could not see a relationship between Section 14 of
RFC 8843 [I-D.ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation] and the RTP header
ext…