-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
2 videocard installed, everything installed and running, here a benchmark
#1: 'CAL++ Device #1 'ATI CYPRESS'': 82426.3 PMKs/s (RTT 2.4)
#2: 'CAL++ Device #…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
2 videocard installed, everything installed and running, here a benchmark
#1: 'CAL++ Device #1 'ATI CYPRESS'': 82426.3 PMKs/s (RTT 2.4)
#2: 'CAL++ Device #…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
2 videocard installed, everything installed and running, here a benchmark
#1: 'CAL++ Device #1 'ATI CYPRESS'': 82426.3 PMKs/s (RTT 2.4)
#2: 'CAL++ Device #…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
2 videocard installed, everything installed and running, here a benchmark
#1: 'CAL++ Device #1 'ATI CYPRESS'': 82426.3 PMKs/s (RTT 2.4)
#2: 'CAL++ Device #…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
2 videocard installed, everything installed and running, here a benchmark
#1: 'CAL++ Device #1 'ATI CYPRESS'': 82426.3 PMKs/s (RTT 2.4)
#2: 'CAL++ Device #…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
2 videocard installed, everything installed and running, here a benchmark
#1: 'CAL++ Device #1 'ATI CYPRESS'': 82426.3 PMKs/s (RTT 2.4)
#2: 'CAL++ Device #…
-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
2 videocard installed, everything installed and running, here a benchmark
#1: 'CAL++ Device #1 'ATI CYPRESS'': 82426.3 PMKs/s (RTT 2.4)
#2: 'CAL++ Device #…
-
The surface laptop studio seems well supported by linux-surface.
Do you think linux-surface would also support the surface laptop studio 2 ?
Regards
deb75 updated
1 month ago
-
This is attempting to replicate a failure I've seen in the resilience CI, e.g. here: https://github.com/StanfordLegion/resilience/actions/runs/10647296358/job/29515103267
Failure mode:
```
#7 …
-