-
Dear copyright holders,
I believe there are issues with the way fullPages.js is licensed. I specifically address all copyright holders since this project has taken contributions from others, which…
-
Thank you for AuthPass and releasing it under the GPLv3.0. I am working on approving AuthPass for the [Free Software Directory][0] (FSD), but I am having trouble determining if it is licensed under [G…
-
Since we moved licensing to the deb-packaging branch, it's no longer clear what the licensing is for images in this repo or for any of the other code/metadata. A LICENSE.md file that clarifies GPLv3 f…
-
Early on in the history of this repo, I threw on the MIT license. Looking back in retrospect, and looking forward about the potential directions of this project, I realize that MIT may not be the most…
Univa updated
4 months ago
-
Hi,
I was having a look at the nRF licenses for softdevices and they are all closed source binaries. Since this project is released under the GPLv3, technically this prevents the redistribution of …
-
Why use a restrictive license GPLv3? If its because of the epub integration, consider licensing the library under something less restrictive and keep the app under GPLv3.
-
## Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe
Supports new licensing requirements for the Blender Extensions Platform.
https://extensions.blender.org/approval-queue/vrm/#activ…
-
@thecapacity In a72203a0d you change the GPL-v3 licensing of this project to Public-Domain.
IANAL, but I believe you are not entitled to that, although your motives are kind.
My understanding i…
-
Hello,
Is the dual licensing meant as 'AND' (you have to fulfill both BSD and GPLv3) or an 'OR' (you either have to fulfill BSD or GPLv3).
If the argument is the AND, the BSD license is not requ…
Skeen updated
6 years ago
-
#### Summary
The [LICENSE file ](https://github.com/canonical/microk8s/blob/master/LICENSE)shows Apache 2.0, but there are several files listing GPL v3
Example: https://github.com/canonical/microk…