-
This issue outlines gaps in testing of various cryptographic capabilities. Tasks _may_ have partial test coverage today (linked if true). If sufficient test coverage already exists, please close the t…
-
### Acceptance Criteria:
1. The Disable_JWS flag will no longer impact the transmission of JWS signatures from the payer to the payee DFSP.
2. Any JWS signature received from the payer will be dir…
-
## Environment
- ejabberd version: 24.07
- Erlang version: Erlang (SMP,ASYNC_THREADS) (BEAM) emulator version 15.0.1
- OS: Linux (Arch Linux)
- Installed from: distro package
## Errors from e…
-
This work should hold off until the ticket here is closed https://github.com/TBD54566975/web5-rs/issues/143
---
Currently we verify JWS's only on the cryptographic signature, but we have a set o…
-
I have a use case where it I need to produce a JWT where the payload data shouldn't be included in the token itself, as described [here in the spec](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7515#appendix-F).
-
Most (all?) JWTs/JWSs defined by Federation are mandated to contain the `typ` header parameter with a suitable value, e.g., `trust-mark+jwt` or `entity-statement+jwt`.
However, as far as I can see,…
-
Add JSON signing support via JWS
-
![1721284001438-jws (1)](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/db3a363f-aaab-4f1b-8510-b6f111f6ebe3)
-
in the `SafetyNetApi.AttestationResponse.getJWSResult()` jws string, it is supposed to contain 2 periods according to the [JWS spec](https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-36#p…
-
We need to add support for [detached content](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7515#appendix-F) to [our compact JWS implementation](https://github.com/TBD54566975/web5-rs/pull/162/files). Spec…