-
https://github.com/sugarlabs/memorize-activity/blob/master/activity/activity.info contains the following license.
```
license = GPLv2+;GPLv3+
```
which is not valid SPDX license expression. He…
sidt4 updated
3 months ago
-
See also link in [`README.rst`](https://github.com/nexB/license-expression/blob/README.rst?plain=1#L51) to *SPDX License Expressions* gives 404 from:
`See also for details:`
`- https://spdx.github…
-
### Description
The Ruby Package Ecosystem miss to tag the `key_files` properly that affects the proper attributes population at Package Level and further the `license_clarity_score`
#### Example
…
-
Currently, the library uses strings as license expressions. Implement proper handling of license expressions instead.
-
### Description
If we run ScanCode for https://github.com/platformdirs/platformdirs/tree/3.0.0/ we expect to find the copyright from https://github.com/platformdirs/platformdirs/blob/3.0.0/LICENSE …
-
When I add a package as a dependency which contains a commercial license I get the error `Validation for licenses of type File not yet supported`
## Dependency.csproj
```xml
...
LICENSE.txt
…
-
### What's the problem this feature will solve?
The output from `pip show` can be quite verbose when the package includes the full license, making it harder to get the other basic information like …
-
### What it does
If a `license` field is defined in `Cargo.toml`, checks the contents to be a valid SPDX 2.1 license expression.
https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/manifest.html#the-lice…
-
### Description
From the following file ScanCode does not extract "MIT" license when running ScanCode **without** --package option:
https://github.com/components/font-awesome/blob/f4f114c4ab37d10…
-
I ran a scan_single_package for https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/29/8a/f4cf3f32bc554f9260b645ea1151449ac13525796d3d1a42076d75945d8d/Pillow-9.5.0-cp312-cp312-win_amd64.whl and the summary is w…