-
Can you add the support of RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3?
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9266
Channel Bindings for TLS: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5929
- XEP…
-
## Cilium Feature Proposal
Thanks for taking time to make a feature proposal for Cilium! If you have usage questions, please try the [slack channel](https://slack.cilium.io) and see the [FAQ](https…
-
I have a desktop software that can set up a proxy to communicate with the server. Through Wireshark packet capture, I discovered that the ClientHello message uses GMTLS, and the encryption suite is EC…
-
Can you add the support of RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3?
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9266
Little details, to know easily:
- tls-unique for TLS =< 1.2
- tls-server-end-p…
-
### Describe the solution
Hi there! Not sure if this should be a bug or a feature request, but here's my need:
I'm trying to build a Gemini proxy (an HTTP proxy for the Gemini protocol).
More inf…
-
### Problem
In the current Minetest protocol, servers are unauthenticated and the connection is unencrypted. It is therefore always possible for a MITM to hijack or snoop on a connection after a su…
-
I spent a few time to think about it. Some talented developers have dedicated a lot of effort to obfuscating network traffic, making it appear as normal Chrome traffic. So why don't we implement an MI…
-
#### Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I am trying to MITM a MySQL protocol connection. This protocol can start as plain text, and then switch to TLS (as signified by a C…
-
Can you add the support of RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3?
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9266
Channel Bindings for TLS: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5929
- XEP…
-
Dear @qxmpp-project team,
I add this ticket for memory and Qt security improvements.
Can you add the support of RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3?
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/r…