-
After:
- SCRAM-SHA-1
- SCRAM-SHA-256
- SCRAM-SHA-512
Can you add supports of :
- SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS
- SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS
- SCRAM-SHA-512-PLUS
- SCRAM-SHA3-512
- SCRAM-SHA3-512-PLUS
You can…
-
Dear @Pineconium,
Your project is very good!
For have a perfect security point of view, can you add supports of :
- SCRAM-SHA-1
- SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS
- SCRAM-SHA-256
- SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS
- SCR…
-
Dear @gen-smtp team,
In first, I wish you a Happy New Year!
Can you add supports of:
- SCRAM-SHA-1
- SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS
- SCRAM-SHA-256
- SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS
- SCRAM-SHA-512
- SCRAM-SHA-512-P…
-
Can you add the support of RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3?
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9266
Channel Bindings for TLS: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5929
- XEP-…
-
Dear @DbUp team,
In first, I wish you a Happy New Year!
Can you add supports of:
- SCRAM-SHA-256
- SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS
Thanks in advance.
All informations about SCRAM:
"When using the …
-
Can you add the support of RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3?
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9266
Little details, to know easily:
- tls-unique for TLS =< 1.2
- tls-server-end-p…
-
After the unsecure and obsolete DIGEST-MD5, can you add supports of :
- SCRAM-SHA-1
- SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS
- SCRAM-SHA-224
- SCRAM-SHA-224-PLUS
- SCRAM-SHA-256
- SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS
- SCRAM-SHA-384
…
-
Dear @NefixEstrada,
Good job for this new project :)
After:
- SCRAM-SHA-1
Can you add supports of :
- SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS
- SCRAM-SHA-224
- SCRAM-SHA-224-PLUS
- SCRAM-SHA-256
- SCRAM-SHA-2…
-
"When using the SASL SCRAM mechanism, the SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS variant SHOULD be preferred over the SCRAM-SHA-256 variant, and SHA-256 variants [RFC7677] SHOULD be preferred over SHA-1 variants [RFC5802…
-
Dear @duesee,
Can you add supports of :
- SCRAM-SHA-1
- SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS
- SCRAM-SHA-256
- SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS
- SCRAM-SHA-512
- SCRAM-SHA-512-PLUS
- SCRAM-SHA3-512
- SCRAM-SHA3-512-PLUS
…