-
Packaging systems probably would cover this, but if I load RxJS globally (see #1274 ), into the browser, it would be nice to be able to tell RxJS5 apart from RxJS4. This allows me to make a library th…
-
Current interface for `Subject::Create()` is defined as `Subject::Create(source: Observable, destination: Observer)`, parameter order is reversed to RxJS 4(https://github.com/Reactive-Extensions/RxJS/…
-
I'm wondering if you have any plans to move this to RxJS5, since it's much faster, more debuggable, etc.
But if you're already using this quite a lot with RxJS4, maybe not worth the hassle?
-
While trying to migrate test coverage in RxJS4, could observe difference between signature of `debounce` operator
RxJS4
```
Rx.Observable.prototype.debounce(dueTime, [scheduler])
Rx.Observable.proto…
-
Seems that the RxJS4 and RxJS5 columns are exactly the same?
ronag updated
6 years ago
-
**RxJS version:**
`5.2.0` / master
**Code to reproduce:**
Observable.empty().find(_ => false)
**Expected behavior:**
Should not yield any result, as expected (and as per rxjs4 behav…
gluck updated
6 years ago
-
Should we have this operator? People could just `ReplaySubject`, but maybe this is nice to have.
Might require `replay` to be implemented if this were added though (which, iirc, just uses ReplaySubje…
-
In some cases it seems resubscription does not triggered correctly. for example,
`Rx.Observable.interval(40).take(2).repeat(2).subscribe(console.log, null, function(){console.log('completed')});`
_…
-
Current implementation of skipUntil() does not handle some cases such as argument observable raises error like
```
var e1 = hot('--a--b--c--d--e--|');
var skip = hot('-------------#');
var expected…
-
Hello.
There is a method in rxjs4 [takeLastBuffer](http://reactivex.io/documentation/operators/takelast.html#collapseRxJS)
[docs](http://xgrommx.github.io/rx-book/content/observable/observable_insta…