-
Hi! When checking the system status, I receive the following message: This domain is listed in the Spamhaus Domain Block List (code 127.255.255.254), which may prevent recipients from receiving your m…
-
Quoted from [RFC 7816, section 3](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7816#section-3):
> A problem can also appear when a name server does not react properly
> to ENTs (Empty Non-Terminals). If en…
-
### Which feature or improvement would you like to request?
Looking at `config.sieve` there seems to be no control given over which DNS blocklists to use. People may wish to disable certain blockl…
-
https://www.spamhaus.org/news/article/807/using-our-public-mirrors-check-your-return-codes-now.
The following results indicate an error:
- 127.255.255.252
- 127.255.255.254
- 127.255.255.255
…
-
add spamhaus as api
-
Hi, i prefer to prepend the Spamhaus chain at the top (like fail2ban,...) of iptables, instead of appending it at the bottom.
Line 35-39:
```
# tie chain to input rules so it runs
$IPTABLES -I INPU…
-
This isn't a bug with the rulset you provide as such, but now I am seeing two firings of XBL.
```
SPAMHAUS_ZEN (14) [23.129.64.225:from]
MSBL_EBL (7.5) [jchavalii@gmail.com:email]
R_SUSPICIOUS_U…
-
hi;
i'm running firehol on debian9 which I installed via apt install -y firehol firehol-tools
than this is my firehol.conf which I'm pretty you saw crazier..
````
version 6
ENABLE_IPV6=0
local…
-
As far as I can tell, courier doesn't directly support current Spamhaus DNSBL return codes. I'm posting the issue here to ask if anyone can verify, and to publish my own understanding for others to l…
-
I believe this should be using `source.port`:
https://github.com/certtools/intelmq/blob/ce60fd4bf65b0ca2d98ac05c4db658890dbac1a3/intelmq/bots/parsers/spamhaus/parser_cert.py#L168