-
@andersoncardoso , @science
As noted previously, the updated schema [(http://credreg.net/ctdl/Schema/20161117/validation/json](url) is quite different from that currently in the registry. It is curr…
ghost updated
7 years ago
-
Hello, I am absolutely unsure if this is a bug or if I am using it incorrectly.
I would like to create verifiable credentials via didkit-cli.
If I use an official context as a source, everything w…
-
Hey all,
I had a good chat with @ve7jtb, Mike Jones and @balfanz at IIW about ways in which the browser could help Web Wallets, and wanted to take notes here to kick off a discussion.
I'm a br…
-
Add a section to the specification that provides an overview of the cryptography data elements used (see example below), with, with reference links (usually [[ref: ]]s) to where those elements are def…
-
In reading through some of the discussion about the DID resolver spec, I feel like some of the feature requests (for instance #27) are more for what I might call a "remote" did-resolver, which though …
-
@tplooker We have tended to note that the `sub` field be a cryptographically verifiable URI.
Where a DID would fall into that category, so have generally be specifying DIDs directly as the `sub`.
No…
-
**_301 Moved Permanently_: The [updated version of the Threat Model](https://github.com/w3c-cg/threat-modeling/blob/main/models/decentralized-identities.md) is in the [Threat Model Community Group](ht…
-
## Linked Issues
- #47
- #38
- #23
- #60
- #61
- #46
- #43
- #31
## Problems
- The risk of centralized digital identity system: Addhar https://journals.openedition.org/sama…
-
One piece of feedback we've heard is that it seems premature to unify different credential types into `IdentityCredential` if all they're really sharing is a `nonce` and `response` and if the `Identit…
-