-
Mozilla will be [dropping support](https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2017/02/16/the-road-to-firefox-57-compatibility-milestones/) for XUL extensions in Firefox 57, so this needs to be ported to the WebE…
-
Several of the examples here pull in dependencies for stuff like react, babel, webpack, eslint. They are useful to show how WebExtensions can integrate these technologies, but I think they are outside…
-
Firefox recently introduced two new APIs for WebExtensions, called Content Script API and User Script API. The APIs are supposed to replace the current methods of injecting remote code (code not avail…
-
Would be good to work towards making this extension also available on Firefox (and any other WebExtensions-compatible browser).
Since now Chrome and Firefox both support WebExtensions, this shouldn…
-
Since adding support for other browsers means more time spent on testing, debugging and deploying, we'll let the community handle this one. If you want the extension to work in one of the following br…
-
This issue aims to discuss potentially aligning document targeting concepts between WebExtensions and WebDriver BiDi.
In the past year, the WebExtensions Community Group (WECG) has aligned around …
-
Extension Service workers and [(limited) event pages](https://github.com/w3c/webextensions/issues/134) are terminated when they are idle for a period of time. The mechanisms for determining the termin…
-
Firefox has almost the same APIs as Chrome https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/WebExtensions/Browser_support_for_JavaScript_APIs
Most extensions take minutes to port https://vimeo.com/24143…
-
Please, might you rewrite this extension using WebExtensions APIs?
-
Might be worth looking at in the future when [WebExtensions](https://wiki.mozilla.org/WebExtensions) is ready and supports all APIs needed by PP.